Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Marc Jacobs "Bag on Bag"

Why? Oh Why Marc?
Why do you have to ruin this pretty red tote by adding the sequin clutch on it? It's not working when you did it for LV, and once again it's not going to work in your own line.
When i see this bag, all i can think of is ripping the clutch away. it looks like a hump, a big annoying mole, a fungus, a jellyfish on a skin. It's just plain ugly, ok?

Marc Jacobs Serafima Bag on Bag Small

red leather, silver-tone hardware, top handles; removable brown webbed cross-body strap with logo plate, framed top; turn-lock closure, tonal bag detail on front with allover red sequin squares; kiss-lock closure.
size : 13 1/2"H x 13"W x 1"D
currently retails for $2250

Marc Jacobs Mesh Lace Robert Bag on Bag
OK, with the serafima bag at least the red leather tote itself is nice, but this one, i can't see the beauty in any part of the bag. And what's up with the B letter there?
Mesh tote/lace bag/calf leather
double top handle, 4" drop, detachable shoulder strap, turn lock closure, silver tone hardware, double frog closure on bag is embellished with crystals
size : 15"W X 15½"H X 1½"D
currently retails for $2100


cecil said...

Naturally, it will be B for Bag, duh. :p lol

bagcraze said...

LOL omg!!! it's so literal though ha ha ha...
i expect something more meaningful LOL

virgilwirgil said...

First off, it's not a "B" for "bag" it's a "B" because all the different bags from that collection had a different letter from Marc Jacobs' name, look at the other similar styles and you will see the other various letters. For being "bagaholics" you sure aren't observant.

Secondly, that bag is gorgeous, who in the world wants another plain red leather tote bag that you could buy anywhere?

miumiu handbag said...

i really love the frog shaped embellishments with gems!